Explain how carter uses language to change the voice of the narrator throughout the bloody chamber Essay Example

Explain how carter uses language to change the voice of the narrator throughout the bloody chamber Essay Example Explain how carter uses language to change the voice of the narrator throughout the bloody chamber Essay Explain how carter uses language to change the voice of the narrator throughout the bloody chamber Essay Essay Topic: There Will Be Blood Carter uses language devices to reflect change in the narrators voice throughout. For example, most pornographic of confrontations this is metaphorical imagery. As pornography is sex from a secondary perspective this shows the narrators reaction to the prospect of sex, an element of self detachment, as pornography is the act of sex as viewed from an outsider. This shows that the narrator feels vulnerable and uncomfortable with the proposed sexual act. It could suggest that she is using metaphorical imagery to emotionally distance herself from the situation, as to describe a potential sexual encounter using language other than what is literally occurring could suggest that she is trying to remove her feelings from it. However, the mention of pornography could outline the feeling of shame the narrator feels, as it is affiliated with social taboos and embarrassment. This would show that through her materialistic intent she is begrudgingly in a sexual situation, with the man she is only with for his fortune. She might feel like a prostitute through this, and therefore shameful for her choices. Carter uses this device to express that sex should be entirely consensual, not just through acceptance of it, but for both partners to want to under no pressure or feeling of shame. Later, the theme of sex is furtherly explored and language is used again to represent change in the narrators voice. For example, her cunt a split fig this is heightened language. This could indicate an imitation of the marquiss attitude towards sex, confrontational and desensitized. Therefore showing that through a self realization of shame through her materialistic intentions and for where they led her, she may believe that she is no better than him, and therefore is acting like him. The juxtaposition of reaction towards sex in the novel could indicate that she perhaps is mentally damaged to an extent of which is relative to mental illness, and therefore could suggest that her account lacks reliability. Also, because the voice is referring to the past tense this could indicate that her taboo language is expressed through spite and discontent presently, and therefore because it is spoken retrospectively it defies the happy ending clichà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ evident in generic fairytales. Cart ers intention here was to emphasize the current emotional state of the narrator, and to therefore make the reader question her reliability as a source. Also, her intention could be to corrode the happy ever after fairytale ending, because bluebeard featured this, through using intertexuality she brings a sense of realism into the story. Carter uses language devices to depict change in the narrators voice. For example, lamb chop appetite artichoke are all words relative to the semantic field of food. Food is a necessary and regular requirement, and therefore the narrator feels that this is parallel to her husbands libido. Also, food is something that is bought and owned by the buyer, this could questionably be relative to the narrators position, as what she wanted from him was purely materialistic and so her love has been bought by him, and she may feel like his possession and therefore obligatory to his needs. This implicates his needs, but her passion isnt evident and therefore the sexual area of their relationship is entirely his lust. Carters intention here was to show that men generally see and treat women as inanimate objects, and therefore when a womans opinion and attitude towards sex, among other things relative to a relationship is ignored, the relationship is unequal. And therefore Carter is emphasizing th at unequal relationships are wrong.